IESG agenda: 2017-12-14

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions
Proposed Standard
OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Cisco's Statement of IPR Related to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-01
Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

IETF stream
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing
Proposed Standard
Segment Routing Architecture
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep
Proposed Standard
JavaScript Session Establishment Protocol
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-anima-voucher
Proposed Standard
Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols
Token
Terry Manderson (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-intarea-probe
Proposed Standard
PROBE: A Utility For Probing Interfaces
Token
Suresh Krishnan (INT area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-stir-certificates (Has RFC Editor Note)
Proposed Standard
Secure Telephone Identity Credentials: Certificates
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology
Proposed Standard
A YANG Data Model for Layer 3 Topologies
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo
Proposed Standard
A Data Model for Network Topologies
Token
Alia Atlas (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

IETF stream
draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis
Proposed Standard
YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery
Token
Alissa Cooper (OPS area)
IANA review
Version Changed - Review Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases
Informational
IPv6 SPRING Use Cases
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases
Informational
Resiliency use cases in SPRING networks
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase
Informational
A Scalable and Topology-Aware MPLS Dataplane Monitoring System
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe
Informational
Segment Routing Centralized BGP Egress Peer Engineering
Token
Alvaro Retana (RTG area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Google Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe and draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe

IETF stream
draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management
Informational
Autonomic IPv6 Edge Prefix Management in Large-scale Networks
Token
Terry Manderson (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews
IPR
Orange's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management

IETF stream
draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut
Informational
Graceful BGP session shutdown
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-liu-policy-based-management-framework
IETF conflict review for draft-liu-policy-based-management-framework
ISE Informational
draft-liu-policy-based-management-framework
SUPA Policy-based Management Framework
Token
Benoit Claise

Conflict review
conflict-review-klensin-dns-function-considerations
IETF conflict review for draft-klensin-dns-function-considerations
ISE Informational
draft-klensin-dns-function-considerations
DNS Privacy, Authorization, Special Uses, Encoding, Characters, Matching, and Root Structure: Time for Another Look?
Token
Terry Manderson

Conflict review
conflict-review-seantek-pkcs8-encrypted
IETF conflict review for draft-seantek-pkcs8-encrypted
ISE Informational
draft-seantek-pkcs8-encrypted
The PKCS #8 EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo Media Type
Token
Alexey Melnikov

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
Software Updates for Internet of Things (suit)
Charter
charter-ietf-suit-(00-09)
Area
SEC (Kathleen Moriarty)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #989331] Acceptance of media-type registration from standards organization HL7 (Alexey Melnikov)

6.2 [IANA #990872] Approval for media type application/pkcs8-encrypted (Amanda Baber / IANA)

6.3 Designated Experts for "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Parameters Registry" (Alexey Melnikov)

6.4 [IANA #987938] Designated expert for RFC-weis-gdoi-rekey-ack (Kathleen Moriarty)

6.5 [IANA #986138] Designated expert for RFC 8292 (Adam Roach)

6.6 IETF 101 and 102 Important Dates (Alexa Morris / IETF Secretariat)

6.7 IESG management of Designated Experts for non-IETF RFC publication streams (Alexey Melnikov)

6.8 Executive Session: Selection of IAOC candidate (Alissa Cooper)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)