IESG agenda: 2018-04-19

1. Administrivia

1.1 Roll call

1.2 Bash the agenda

1.3 Approval of the minutes of past telechats

1.4 List of remaining action items from last telechat

            (Error reading /a/www/www6/iesg/internal/task.txt)
          

2. Protocol actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG submissions

2.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types
Proposed Standard
Requirements for pNFS Layout Types
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-core-senml
Proposed Standard
Media Types for Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML)
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-curdle-pkix
Proposed Standard
Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519 and X448 for use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Token
Eric Rescorla (SEC area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud
Proposed Standard
Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
Token
Ignas Bagdonas (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mmusic-rid
Proposed Standard
RTP Payload Format Restrictions
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
Proposed Standard
Negotiating Media Multiplexing Using the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
Token
Ben Campbell (ART area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-stir-rph
Proposed Standard
PASSporT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization
Token
Adam Roach (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-tram-stunbis
Proposed Standard
Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
Token
Spencer Dawkins (TSV area)
IANA review
IANA OK - Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt (Has RFC Editor Note)
Proposed Standard
SMTP TLS Reporting
Token
Alexey Melnikov (ART area)
IANA review
IANA - Not OK
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

2.1.2 Returning items

(None)

2.2 Individual submissions

2.2.1 New items

(None)

2.2.2 Returning items

(None)

2.3 Status changes

2.3.1 New items

(None)

2.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3. Document actions

3.1 WG submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New items

IETF stream
draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term
Informational
Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

IETF stream
draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth
Informational
Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance
Token
Warren Kumari (OPS area)
IANA review
IANA OK - No Actions Needed
Consensus
Yes
Reviews

3.1.2 Returning items

(None)

3.2 Individual submissions via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New items

(None)

3.2.2 Returning items

(None)

3.3 Status changes

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Are the proposed changes to document status appropriate? Have all requirements for such a change been met? If not, what changes to the proposal would make it appropriate?"

3.3.1 New items

(None)

3.3.2 Returning items

(None)

3.4 IRTF and Independent Submission stream documents

The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses:

  1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work;
  2. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG <X>, but this relationship does not prevent publishing;
  3. The IESG has concluded that publication could potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG <X> and recommends not publishing the document at this time;
  4. The IESG has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for <Y> and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; or
  5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the conflict-review document, and the document shepherd may supply text for an IESG Note in that document. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG should request inclusion of the IESG Note.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.4.1 New items

Conflict review
conflict-review-young-entity-category
IETF conflict review for draft-young-entity-category
ISE Informational
draft-young-entity-category
The Entity Category SAML Attribute Types
Token
Eric Rescorla

3.4.2 Returning items

(None)

4. Working Group actions

4.1 WG creation

4.1.1 Proposed for IETF review

(None)

4.1.2 Proposed for approval

WG name
IETF Administrative Support Activity 2 (iasa2)
Charter
charter-ietf-iasa2-(00-02)
Area
GEN (Alissa Cooper)

4.2 WG rechartering

4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF review

(None)

4.2.2 Proposed for approval

(None)

5. IAB news we can use

6. Management issues

6.1 [IANA #1056644] Designated expert for RFC-ietf-bier-isis-extensions (Alvaro Retana)

6.2 Update to "AEAD Algorithm" IANA registry to point to draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis (Alexey Melnikov)

6.3 Designated expert for RFC 8225 [IANA #1055836] (Adam Roach)

7. Any Other Business (WG News, New Proposals, etc.)